It’s Back… Blackburn Returns

September 3, 2015 Leave a comment

wheelerThere’s a children’s story about Alexander and his terrible, horrible, no good, very bad day.  For taxpayers, commuters, and people who live near or drive through the Route 234/I-66 interchange (the one with Koons Honda, not the bypass…), that day could be September 29.

The Board of County Supervisors postponed the original date for considering the Blackburn rezoning – but it’s back on the agenda.

Same staff report, same problems – massive amount of residential development, minimal offsetting benefits from commercial development.  More congestion on local roads, higher taxes to subsidize services to residential development  and a windfall profit for a landowner selling the parcel.

Gee, I wonder why some supervisors might vote for this project…



Categories: Land Use, Transportation

Like Higher Taxes and Long Commutes? Then You’ll Like Rezoning Blackburn on May 12…

May 9, 2015 Leave a comment

recThere’s a direct link between economic development, traffic congestion, property taxes, and land conservation.

If we zone parcels for offices, recruit businesses to those locations, then Prince William residents can get to jobs without commuting through traffic jams in Fairfax County.   50% of Prince William’s workers drive to jobs outside the county, and 100% of commuters grumble about traffic.

New jobs reduce the residential property tax burden too.   In job-rich Arlington County, residents pay only 50% of the property taxes. In Prince William County, residents pay over 80% of property taxes because so little commercial development has occurred here.

So you’d think the Prince William supervisors would be focused on getting commercial development at the I-66/Route 234 interchange. It’s the closest one to Fairfax County, and the place with the highest potential to create a reverse commute. That’s why the area is planned as Regional Employment Center (REC).

So why are the county supervisors planning to rezone the Blackburn property there to build 415 houses and require almost no commercial development? That rezoning would sacrifice a great opportunity to create local jobs and local tax revenue.

The idea of building houses there – well, it stinks. If you want to reduce the burden of taxes on homeowners, if you want to generate more revenue to fund schools and other service, if you want to minimize the commuting nightmare by creating local jobs – you would not use one of the most attractive parcels for economic development at the I-66 interchange for residential development.

Conservation is the wise use of natural resources. Rezoning Blackburn for residential use would qualify as a waste, not as a wise use of land.

Categories: Uncategorized

Funeral for Vampire? (Update on the Bi-County Parkway)

April 1, 2015 Leave a comment

bi-countysprawlway The headline is “Bi-County Parkway project is dead.”  Maybe, but it’s only in stasis right now. There was a press conference held today at Sudley United Methodist Church to announce that the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) is no longer pursuing completion of the project – but hey, it was April 1…

Public opposition to the road became clear quickly. State officials took the lead in stopping the road, overcoming support from local supervisors, Loudoun County developers, the National Park Service, and officials at Dulles Airport who speculated that the highway would increase the value of airport land on Route 50 before that property is developed.

VDOT went so far as to run an advertising campaign to build support for the road with messages placed on top of local gas pumps, but that use of public funds backfired. Del. Bob Marshall noted at the press conference that the best way to ensure the project was not restarted was for local officials to remove the Bi-County Parkway from the county’s Comprehensive Plan.  Otherwise, like vampires and zombies, the road could be revived later and the approval/funding process re-started.

Pete Candland is expected to propose a Comprehensive Plan Amendment next Tuesday to remove the Bi-County Parkway from the County’s Plan. (You won’t find Bi-County Parkway in The Transportation Chapter of the county’s comprehensive plan refers to the Bi-County Parkway as the Route 234 Bypass – North, PA-13 on page 25.)  If a majority of the Board of County Supervisors act to delete the road, then re-starting the project becomes much much harder and the “Bi-County Parkway project is dead” claim is more realistic.

One other stake could be driven through the vampire’s heart.  If Prince William County started a Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program like Fauquier County, then properties along the route of the proposed Bi-County Parkway could be protected in perpetuity as farmland through conservation easements.

bi-countyApril 1, 15 press conference at Sudley United Methodist Church announcing the Bi-County Parkway is “dead”

Categories: Transportation

Spring is just around the corner!

February 25, 2015 Leave a comment

Thanks to hard working volunteers, we’re looking forward to a spring that is bursting with blooms at Merrimac Farm! Join us on 3/14 and more to help keep up the good work … the schedule is online at

Categories: Merrimac Farm WMA

Route 28 from Manassas to I-66: a “No-Brainer”

December 18, 2014 1 comment

congestionRight now, it requires 46 minutes on average to drive the 6.2 miles from Liberia Avenue in Manassas to I-66 in Centreville.  It’s a no-brainer – Route 28 needs to be fixed.

VDOT held a public meeting last night in Manassas Park to discuss Phase 1 of the Route 28 Corridor Safety and Operations Study, with 100 or so projects that could be implemented without buying land or relocating utilities.  These are the quick “band aids” that could be built within 18 months after funding is available.  Longer-term fixes, such as widening the 4-lane bridge over Bull Run, won’t be considered until 2016.

Why so long?  In 2013, the General Assembly raised taxes and provided substantial new funding for transportation in HB2013 – but in 2014, a new law (HB2) required adoption of new state rules to prioritize large transportation projects.  That law was triggered in part by plans to build the Bi-County Parkway, rather than fix Route 28 or I-66.

Two take-aways from last night’s discussion:

1) VDOT will not start to plan for possible transit solutions to reduce congestion on Route 28 until 2016
2) If the Prince William Board of County Supervisors chooses to rezone Cayden Ridge to add 188 more houses, the voters are paying attention to the traffic impacts

Read more…

Categories: Transportation

The Rural Crescent Review – Keep Your Eye on the Process

December 8, 2014 Leave a comment

Nokesville farm

Reconstituting the County’s Agricultural and Forestral District Advisory Committee is the talk of the town in the Brentsville District and east Prince William residents should be interested too. The Prince William Board of County Supervisors (BOCS) is set to unveil a slate of nominees that would revive this currently dormant committee, withith little or no debate.

Right now the committee’s sole purpose is to determine whether a property should enter or leave Prince William County Agricultural and Forestral District. The County Agricultural and Forestral Disrict covers 2,200 acres or 0.01% of the County. Properties included within the district are given special tax breaks as an incentive for agricultural production.

This all sounds pretty hohum, but don’t fall asleep yet: the current discussion focuses on expanding the role of this committee to advise the Board of County Supervisors on an un-named new set of issues. Read more…

Categories: Uncategorized

Playing The Long Game to Ensure Public Access to Public Lands/Waters

December 3, 2014 Leave a comment

lakemanassasdamsmJust before Thanksgiving, the Manassas City Council killed the latest initiative to open Lake Manassas to fishing and non-motorized boating.

The sponsor of the effort, Marc Aveni, was quoted in an InsideNOVA article:
This issue will come back. Maybe not this year, maybe not next year but there’s no way that a resource like that in an area like this with the sense that it makes to open it up to public use will be denied for too long.

At some point, savvy politicians will identify how public use could provide benefits (or lower costs) for Manassas, and the issue will be re-opened.  Recreational opportunities in still-suburbanizing Northern Virginia are valued, and locking up the lake will be recognized as excessively restrictive.

Members of the city council in Manassas will change over time.  The last vote blocked a study that would have identified the risks and analyzed potential impacts of public use.  The FUD campaign (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) to keep the lake closed may continue without any additional facts, but at some point the risks will be put into perspective and different city officials will reconsider the decision.
Read more…

Categories: Lake Manassas

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers